2/5/2024 0 Comments Forced gay rape porn video![]() These rights are rooted in the well-established principle that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment protects not only procedural safeguards but also substantive rights - a doctrine that Thomas has long rejected. Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion, wrote that the reasoning underlying Friday’s opinion should call into question constitutional protections for same-sex marriage, sex between gay couples and contraception, as they are currently understood. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion,” Alito wrote.īut the opinion will be almost certain to fuel questions about whether rights that are seen as having a thin historical record and which are not explicitly referenced in the Constitution - so-called “unenumerated rights” - remain on a firm footing. Texas) and the right to contraception (Griswold v. ![]() Hodges), sex between gay couples (Lawrence v. Writing for the majority, Alito emphasizes that his ruling was a narrow one and would not spillover to decisions on issues like same-sex marriage (Obergefell v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |